The Republic Day of India is the day that marks the adoption of  the Constitution of India  and the transition of India from a British Dominion to a republic  on January 26, 1950. It is one of the three national holidays  in India.
Although India  obtained its independence on August 15, 1947, it did not yet h ave a  permanent constitution; instead, its laws were based on the modified  colonial Government of India Act 1935,  and the country was a Dominion, with George VI as head of state  and Earl  Mountbatten as Governor General. On August 29, 1947, the Drafting  Committee was appointed to draft a permanent constitution, with Bhimrao Ramji  Ambedkar as chairman. A draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to  the Assembly on November 4, 1947. The Assembly met, in sessions open to  public, for 166 days, spread over a period of 2 years, 11 months and 18  days before adopting the Constitution. After many deliberations and some  modifications, the 308 members of the Assembly signed two hand-written  copies of the document (one each in Hindi and English) on January 24,  1950. Two days later, the Constitution of India became the law of all  the Indian lands. The Constitution of India came into effect  only on January 26, 1950. Following elections on January 21, 1950, Rajendra Prasad w
ave a  permanent constitution; instead, its laws were based on the modified  colonial Government of India Act 1935,  and the country was a Dominion, with George VI as head of state  and Earl  Mountbatten as Governor General. On August 29, 1947, the Drafting  Committee was appointed to draft a permanent constitution, with Bhimrao Ramji  Ambedkar as chairman. A draft Constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to  the Assembly on November 4, 1947. The Assembly met, in sessions open to  public, for 166 days, spread over a period of 2 years, 11 months and 18  days before adopting the Constitution. After many deliberations and some  modifications, the 308 members of the Assembly signed two hand-written  copies of the document (one each in Hindi and English) on January 24,  1950. Two days later, the Constitution of India became the law of all  the Indian lands. The Constitution of India came into effect  only on January 26, 1950. Following elections on January 21, 1950, Rajendra Prasad w as elected as the president of India. The  Indian National Congress and other parties had been celebrating January  26th as a symbol of Independence, even before India actually became  independent. Thus, signing the constitution on January 26, to mark and  respect January 26 and the freedom struggle and the freedom fighters. Granville  Austin has described the Indian Constitution drafted by Ambedkar as  'first and foremost a social document.' ... 'The majority of India's  constitutional provisions are either directly arrived at furthering the  aim of social revolution or attempt to foster this revolution by  establishing conditions necessary for its achievement.'
as elected as the president of India. The  Indian National Congress and other parties had been celebrating January  26th as a symbol of Independence, even before India actually became  independent. Thus, signing the constitution on January 26, to mark and  respect January 26 and the freedom struggle and the freedom fighters. Granville  Austin has described the Indian Constitution drafted by Ambedkar as  'first and foremost a social document.' ... 'The majority of India's  constitutional provisions are either directly arrived at furthering the  aim of social revolution or attempt to foster this revolution by  establishing conditions necessary for its achievement.'
The amending mechanism was lauded even at the time of introduction by Ambedkar in the following words: "We can therefore safely say that the Indian federation will not suffer from the faults of rigidity or legalism. Its distinguished feature is that it is a flexible federation."(CAD VII : 36).
"The three mechanisms of the system derived by the Assembly, contrary  to the predictions, have made the constitution flexible at the same  time protected the rights of the states. They have worked better than  the  amending process in any other country where Federalism and the  British Parliamentary system jointly formed the basis of the  constitution" -- Granville Austin, 1966, 321. What Sir Anthony Eden, the Prime Minister of Britain (April 1955 to  January 1957), said at the time of the emergence of Indian Republic is  relevant in this context. He said, ‘Of all the experiments in  government, which have been attempted since the beginning of time, I  believe that the Indian venture into parliamentary government is the  most exciting. A vast subcontinent is attempting to apply to its tens  and thousands of millions a system of free democracy... It is a brave  thing to try to do so. The Indian venture is not a pale imitation of our  practice at home, but a magnified and multiplied reproduction on a  scale we have never dreamt of. If it succeeds, its influence on Asia is  incalculable for good. Whatever the outcome we must honour those who  attempt it.’ Even more meaningful was the opinion expressed by an American  Constitutional authority, Granville Austin, who wrote that what the  Indian Constituent Assembly began was ‘perhaps the greatest political  venture since that originated in Philadelphia in 1787.’
amending process in any other country where Federalism and the  British Parliamentary system jointly formed the basis of the  constitution" -- Granville Austin, 1966, 321. What Sir Anthony Eden, the Prime Minister of Britain (April 1955 to  January 1957), said at the time of the emergence of Indian Republic is  relevant in this context. He said, ‘Of all the experiments in  government, which have been attempted since the beginning of time, I  believe that the Indian venture into parliamentary government is the  most exciting. A vast subcontinent is attempting to apply to its tens  and thousands of millions a system of free democracy... It is a brave  thing to try to do so. The Indian venture is not a pale imitation of our  practice at home, but a magnified and multiplied reproduction on a  scale we have never dreamt of. If it succeeds, its influence on Asia is  incalculable for good. Whatever the outcome we must honour those who  attempt it.’ Even more meaningful was the opinion expressed by an American  Constitutional authority, Granville Austin, who wrote that what the  Indian Constituent Assembly began was ‘perhaps the greatest political  venture since that originated in Philadelphia in 1787.’
"During recent years, it has become fashionable among some citizens  to disparage the founders and their document. These individuals  disappointed by the developments in the country since 1950, have called  for changing the constitution explaining that it has not 'worked'. Such  thinking, in my view, is misguided. Constitutions do not 'work', they  are inert, dependent upon being 'worked' by citizens and elected and  appointed leaders".



0 comments:
Post a Comment